What is the difference in 12_liabilities to bis banks (cons.), short term between Turks and Caicos Islands and Zimbabwe?

12.76 million, with Zimbabwe ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Turks and Caicos Islands and Zimbabwe?

36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.

Where does this data come from?

BIS, published as 12_Liabilities to BIS banks (cons.), short term. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Turks and Caicos Islands vs Zimbabwe: 12_Liabilities to BIS banks (cons.), short term

Turks and Caicos Islands

153.80 million

in 2025

Zimbabwe

166.56 million

in 2025

Turks and Caicos Islands rank

153rd

Zimbabwe rank

151st

12_Liabilities to BIS banks (cons.), short term over time

Turks and Caicos Islands
Zimbabwe

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 166.56 million against 153.80 million in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 12.76 million.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Turks and Caicos Islands's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 153rd and Zimbabwe ranks 151st of 209 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Turks and Caicos Islands averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Turks and Caicos Islands	Zimbabwe	Difference	Ahead
1990s	108.90 million	711.90 million	603.00 million	Zimbabwe
2000s	248.70 million	422.50 million	173.80 million	Zimbabwe
2010s	472.54 million	337.09 million	135.44 million	Turks and Caicos Islands
2020s	247.23 million	304.26 million	57.03 million	Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 12_liabilities to bis banks (cons.), short term, Turks and Caicos Islands or Zimbabwe?: Zimbabwe, at 166.56 million against 153.80 million in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2025.
What is the difference in 12_liabilities to bis banks (cons.), short term between Turks and Caicos Islands and Zimbabwe?: 12.76 million, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Turks and Caicos Islands and Zimbabwe?: 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Turks and Caicos Islands and Zimbabwe rank globally for 12_liabilities to bis banks (cons.), short term?: Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 153rd and Zimbabwe ranks 151st of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?: BIS, published as 12_Liabilities to BIS banks (cons.), short term. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Turks and Caicos Islands vs Zimbabwe: 12_Liabilities to BIS banks (cons.), short term. Statizoid, drawing on BIS. Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/12-liabilities-to-bis-banks-cons-short-term/turks-and-caicos-islands/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/12-liabilities-to-bis-banks-cons-short-term/turks-and-caicos-islands/zimbabwe/">Turks and Caicos Islands vs Zimbabwe: 12_Liabilities to BIS banks (cons.), short term</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: 12_Liabilities to BIS banks (cons.), short term
Source: BIS
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 209 places, 7,020 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed: 24 August 2026

The data are derived from the BIS Consolidated Banking Statistics (CBS), which comprise data on gross consolidated claims of banks resident in the CBS reporting.