Gibraltar vs Hong Kong: 12_Liabilities to BIS banks (cons.), short term, per capita

Gibraltar
30,235 units per person
in 2025
Hong Kong
43,593 units per person
in 2025
Gibraltar rank
14th
Hong Kong rank
11th

12_Liabilities to BIS banks (cons.), short term, per capita over time

  • Gibraltar
  • Hong Kong
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k199020072025

How they compare

Hong Kong currently reports 43,593 units per person against 30,235 units per person in Gibraltar, a difference of 13,358 units per person.

That makes Hong Kong's figure about 1.4 times Gibraltar's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Gibraltar ahead.

Gibraltar ranks 14th and Hong Kong ranks 11th of 208 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Gibraltar averaged higher in 3 and Hong Kong in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gibraltar Hong Kong Difference Ahead
1990s 35,471 units per person 25,281 units per person 10,190 units per person Gibraltar
2000s 88,418 units per person 10,441 units per person 77,977 units per person Gibraltar
2010s 85,638 units per person 31,048 units per person 54,590 units per person Gibraltar
2020s 32,507 units per person 45,035 units per person 12,528 units per person Hong Kong

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 12_liabilities to bis banks (cons.), short term, per capita, Gibraltar or Hong Kong?
Hong Kong, at 43,593 units per person against 30,235 units per person in Gibraltar as of 2025.
What is the difference in 12_liabilities to bis banks (cons.), short term, per capita between Gibraltar and Hong Kong?
13,358 units per person, with Hong Kong ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gibraltar and Hong Kong?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Gibraltar and Hong Kong rank globally for 12_liabilities to bis banks (cons.), short term, per capita?
Gibraltar ranks 14th and Hong Kong ranks 11th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as 12_Liabilities to BIS banks (cons.), short term, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Gibraltar vs Hong Kong: 12_Liabilities to BIS banks (cons.), short term, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/12-liabilities-to-bis-banks-cons-short-term-per-capita/gibraltar/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/12-liabilities-to-bis-banks-cons-short-term-per-capita/gibraltar/hong-kong-sar-china/">Gibraltar vs Hong Kong: 12_Liabilities to BIS banks (cons.), short term, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
12_Liabilities to BIS banks (cons.), short term, per capita
Unit
units per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 6,997 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

12_Liabilities to BIS banks (cons.), short term divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.