Ecuador vs South Africa: 12_Liabilities to BIS banks (cons.), short term, per capita

Ecuador
202.6 units per person
in 2025
South Africa
190.06 units per person
in 2025
Ecuador rank
108th
South Africa rank
110th

12_Liabilities to BIS banks (cons.), short term, per capita over time

  • Ecuador
  • South Africa
100200300199020072025

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 202.6 units per person against 190.06 units per person in South Africa, a difference of 12.54 units per person.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times South Africa's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was South Africa ahead.

Ecuador ranks 108th and South Africa ranks 110th of 208 countries.

South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador South Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 139.13 units per person 206.74 units per person 67.61 units per person South Africa
2000s 91.29 units per person 222.39 units per person 131.1 units per person South Africa
2010s 141.55 units per person 260 units per person 118.45 units per person South Africa
2020s 201.66 units per person 203.22 units per person 1.55 units per person South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 12_liabilities to bis banks (cons.), short term, per capita, Ecuador or South Africa?
Ecuador, at 202.6 units per person against 190.06 units per person in South Africa as of 2025.
What is the difference in 12_liabilities to bis banks (cons.), short term, per capita between Ecuador and South Africa?
12.54 units per person, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and South Africa?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Ecuador and South Africa rank globally for 12_liabilities to bis banks (cons.), short term, per capita?
Ecuador ranks 108th and South Africa ranks 110th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as 12_Liabilities to BIS banks (cons.), short term, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs South Africa: 12_Liabilities to BIS banks (cons.), short term, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/12-liabilities-to-bis-banks-cons-short-term-per-capita/ecuador/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/12-liabilities-to-bis-banks-cons-short-term-per-capita/ecuador/south-africa/">Ecuador vs South Africa: 12_Liabilities to BIS banks (cons.), short term, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
12_Liabilities to BIS banks (cons.), short term, per capita
Unit
units per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 6,997 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

12_Liabilities to BIS banks (cons.), short term divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.