Chile vs Saudi Arabia: 12_Liabilities to BIS banks (cons.), short term, per capita

Chile
1,579 units per person
in 2025
Saudi Arabia
1,828 units per person
in 2025
Chile rank
64th
Saudi Arabia rank
61st

12_Liabilities to BIS banks (cons.), short term, per capita over time

  • Chile
  • Saudi Arabia
05001.0k1.5k2.0k199020072025

How they compare

Saudi Arabia currently reports 1,828 units per person against 1,579 units per person in Chile, a difference of 249 units per person.

That makes Saudi Arabia's figure about 1.2 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 16 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.

Chile ranks 64th and Saudi Arabia ranks 61st of 208 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Saudi Arabia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
1990s 426.81 units per person 479.7 units per person 52.89 units per person Saudi Arabia
2000s 723.76 units per person 752.54 units per person 28.78 units per person Saudi Arabia
2010s 1,373 units per person 1,364 units per person 9.01 units per person Chile
2020s 1,456 units per person 1,649 units per person 193.23 units per person Saudi Arabia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 12_liabilities to bis banks (cons.), short term, per capita, Chile or Saudi Arabia?
Saudi Arabia, at 1,828 units per person against 1,579 units per person in Chile as of 2025.
What is the difference in 12_liabilities to bis banks (cons.), short term, per capita between Chile and Saudi Arabia?
249 units per person, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Saudi Arabia?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Chile and Saudi Arabia rank globally for 12_liabilities to bis banks (cons.), short term, per capita?
Chile ranks 64th and Saudi Arabia ranks 61st of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as 12_Liabilities to BIS banks (cons.), short term, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Saudi Arabia: 12_Liabilities to BIS banks (cons.), short term, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/12-liabilities-to-bis-banks-cons-short-term-per-capita/chile/saudi-arabia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/12-liabilities-to-bis-banks-cons-short-term-per-capita/chile/saudi-arabia/">Chile vs Saudi Arabia: 12_Liabilities to BIS banks (cons.), short term, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
12_Liabilities to BIS banks (cons.), short term, per capita
Unit
units per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 6,997 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

12_Liabilities to BIS banks (cons.), short term divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.