Vietnam vs Zambia: 11_SDR allocation

Vietnam
1.89 billion
in 2025
Zambia
1.87 billion
in 2025
Vietnam rank
61st
Zambia rank
63rd

11_SDR allocation over time

  • Vietnam
  • Zambia
0500.0M1.0B1.5B2.0B199020072025

How they compare

Vietnam currently reports 1.89 billion against 1.87 billion in Zambia, a difference of 17.66 million.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Zambia ahead.

Vietnam ranks 61st and Zambia ranks 63rd of 188 countries.

Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Vietnam Zambia Difference Ahead
1990s 66.40 million 95.15 million 28.75 million Zambia
2000s 68.20 million 97.74 million 29.54 million Zambia
2010s 462.27 million 688.92 million 226.66 million Zambia
2020s 1.42 billion 1.48 billion 59.65 million Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, Vietnam or Zambia?
Vietnam, at 1.89 billion against 1.87 billion in Zambia as of 2025.
What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation between Vietnam and Zambia?
17.66 million, with Vietnam ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Vietnam and Zambia?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Vietnam and Zambia rank globally for 11_sdr allocation?
Vietnam ranks 61st and Zambia ranks 63rd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
IMF, published as 11_SDR allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
11_SDR allocation
Source
IMF
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
189 places, 6,685 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).