Saint Lucia vs East Timor: 11_SDR allocation
11_SDR allocation over time
- Saint Lucia
- East Timor
How they compare
Saint Lucia currently reports 47.58 million against 43.76 million in East Timor, a difference of 3.82 million.
That makes Saint Lucia's figure about 1.1 times East Timor's.
Across all 37 years both countries report, Saint Lucia has been ahead every year.
Saint Lucia ranks 167th and East Timor ranks 168th of 189 countries.
Saint Lucia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saint Lucia | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.03 million | 0 | 1.03 million | Saint Lucia |
| 2000s | 1.06 million | 0 | 1.06 million | Saint Lucia |
| 2010s | 21.39 million | 11.35 million | 10.04 million | Saint Lucia |
| 2020s | 39.55 million | 34.12 million | 5.43 million | Saint Lucia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, Saint Lucia or East Timor?
- Saint Lucia, at 47.58 million against 43.76 million in East Timor as of 2026.
- What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation between Saint Lucia and East Timor?
- 3.82 million, with Saint Lucia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Lucia and East Timor?
- 37 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2026.
- How do Saint Lucia and East Timor rank globally for 11_sdr allocation?
- Saint Lucia ranks 167th and East Timor ranks 168th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- IMF, published as 11_SDR allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).