Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Tonga: 11_SDR allocation
11_SDR allocation over time
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
- Tonga
How they compare
Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 27.78 million against 26.87 million in Tonga, a difference of 917,400.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 37 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Tonga ahead.
Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 180th and Tonga ranks 181st of 189 countries.
Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 12.49 million | 9.66 million | 2.82 million | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2020s | 23.09 million | 21.68 million | 1.41 million | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, Saint Kitts and Nevis or Tonga?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 27.78 million against 26.87 million in Tonga as of 2026.
- What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation between Saint Kitts and Nevis and Tonga?
- 917,400, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Kitts and Nevis and Tonga?
- 37 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2026.
- How do Saint Kitts and Nevis and Tonga rank globally for 11_sdr allocation?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 180th and Tonga ranks 181st of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- IMF, published as 11_SDR allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).