Somalia vs Suriname: 11_SDR allocation
11_SDR allocation over time
- Somalia
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 281.20 million against 275.35 million in Somalia, a difference of 5.85 million.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Somalia ahead.
Somalia ranks 142nd and Suriname ranks 139th of 188 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Somalia averaged higher in 2 and Suriname in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Somalia | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 19.08 million | 10.80 million | 8.29 million | Somalia |
| 2000s | 19.60 million | 11.09 million | 8.51 million | Somalia |
| 2010s | 68.23 million | 129.36 million | 61.13 million | Suriname |
| 2020s | 209.30 million | 230.63 million | 21.33 million | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, Somalia or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 281.20 million against 275.35 million in Somalia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation between Somalia and Suriname?
- 5.85 million, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Somalia and Suriname?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Somalia and Suriname rank globally for 11_sdr allocation?
- Somalia ranks 142nd and Suriname ranks 139th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- IMF, published as 11_SDR allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).