Slovenia vs Tunisia: 11_SDR allocation

Slovenia
1.03 billion
in 2025
Tunisia
1.06 billion
in 2025
Slovenia rank
80th
Tunisia rank
77th

11_SDR allocation over time

  • Slovenia
  • Tunisia
0250.0M500.0M750.0M1.0B199020072025

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 1.06 billion against 1.03 billion in Slovenia, a difference of 23.00 million.

Across all 36 years both countries report, Tunisia has been ahead every year.

Slovenia ranks 80th and Tunisia ranks 77th of 188 countries.

Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Slovenia Tunisia Difference Ahead
1990s 25.21 million 47.70 million 22.50 million Tunisia
2000s 36.39 million 49.00 million 12.61 million Tunisia
2010s 317.02 million 400.57 million 83.55 million Tunisia
2020s 797.77 million 839.67 million 41.90 million Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, Slovenia or Tunisia?
Tunisia, at 1.06 billion against 1.03 billion in Slovenia as of 2025.
What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation between Slovenia and Tunisia?
23.00 million, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Slovenia and Tunisia?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Slovenia and Tunisia rank globally for 11_sdr allocation?
Slovenia ranks 80th and Tunisia ranks 77th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
IMF, published as 11_SDR allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
11_SDR allocation
Source
IMF
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
189 places, 6,685 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).