Serbia vs Zambia: 11_SDR allocation

Serbia
1.43 billion
in 2025
Zambia
1.87 billion
in 2025
Serbia rank
65th
Zambia rank
63rd

11_SDR allocation over time

  • Serbia
  • Zambia
0500.0M1.0B1.5B2.0B199020072025

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 1.87 billion against 1.43 billion in Serbia, a difference of 443.87 million.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.3 times Serbia's.

Across all 20 years both countries report, Zambia has been ahead every year.

Serbia ranks 65th and Zambia ranks 63rd of 188 countries.

Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Serbia Zambia Difference Ahead
2000s 86.28 million 103.99 million 17.72 million Zambia
2010s 653.53 million 688.92 million 35.39 million Zambia
2020s 1.17 billion 1.48 billion 310.74 million Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, Serbia or Zambia?
Zambia, at 1.87 billion against 1.43 billion in Serbia as of 2025.
What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation between Serbia and Zambia?
443.87 million, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Zambia?
20 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2025.
How do Serbia and Zambia rank globally for 11_sdr allocation?
Serbia ranks 65th and Zambia ranks 63rd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
IMF, published as 11_SDR allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
11_SDR allocation
Source
IMF
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
189 places, 6,685 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).