Palau vs Tuvalu: 11_SDR allocation

Palau
10.17 million
in 2025
Tuvalu
5.43 million
in 2025
Palau rank
186th
Tuvalu rank
187th

11_SDR allocation over time

  • Palau
  • Tuvalu
02.5M5.0M7.5M10.0M199020072025

How they compare

Palau currently reports 10.17 million against 5.43 million in Tuvalu, a difference of 4.74 million.

That makes Palau's figure about 1.9 times Tuvalu's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Tuvalu ahead.

Palau ranks 186th and Tuvalu ranks 187th of 188 countries.

Palau has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Palau Tuvalu Difference Ahead
2000s 0 0 0
2010s 4.34 million 2.22 million 2.12 million Palau
2020s 8.24 million 4.45 million 3.79 million Palau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, Palau or Tuvalu?
Palau, at 10.17 million against 5.43 million in Tuvalu as of 2025.
What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation between Palau and Tuvalu?
4.74 million, with Palau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Palau and Tuvalu?
18 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2025.
How do Palau and Tuvalu rank globally for 11_sdr allocation?
Palau ranks 186th and Tuvalu ranks 187th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
IMF, published as 11_SDR allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
11_SDR allocation
Source
IMF
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
189 places, 6,685 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).