Oman vs Yemen: 11_SDR allocation

Oman
930.88 million
in 2025
Yemen
928.78 million
in 2025
Oman rank
84th
Yemen rank
85th

11_SDR allocation over time

  • Oman
  • Yemen
0200.0M400.0M600.0M800.0M1.0B199020072025

How they compare

Oman currently reports 930.88 million against 928.78 million in Yemen, a difference of 2.10 million.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Yemen ahead.

Oman ranks 84th and Yemen ranks 85th of 188 countries.

Yemen has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Oman Yemen Difference Ahead
1990s 8.72 million 40.11 million 31.38 million Yemen
2000s 8.96 million 41.13 million 32.17 million Yemen
2010s 262.59 million 341.06 million 78.47 million Yemen
2020s 711.16 million 734.52 million 23.36 million Yemen

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, Oman or Yemen?
Oman, at 930.88 million against 928.78 million in Yemen as of 2025.
What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation between Oman and Yemen?
2.10 million, with Oman ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Oman and Yemen?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Oman and Yemen rank globally for 11_sdr allocation?
Oman ranks 84th and Yemen ranks 85th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
IMF, published as 11_SDR allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
11_SDR allocation
Source
IMF
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
189 places, 6,685 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).