North Macedonia vs Togo: 11_SDR allocation
11_SDR allocation over time
- North Macedonia
- Togo
How they compare
Togo currently reports 286.24 million against 271.40 million in North Macedonia, a difference of 14.84 million.
That makes Togo's figure about 1.1 times North Macedonia's.
Across all 37 years both countries report, Togo has been ahead every year.
North Macedonia ranks 143rd and Togo ranks 141st of 189 countries.
Togo has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Macedonia | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 8.31 million | 15.29 million | 6.99 million | Togo |
| 2000s | 11.99 million | 15.71 million | 3.72 million | Togo |
| 2010s | 96.36 million | 103.28 million | 6.92 million | Togo |
| 2020s | 218.64 million | 231.05 million | 12.41 million | Togo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, North Macedonia or Togo?
- Togo, at 286.24 million against 271.40 million in North Macedonia as of 2026.
- What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation between North Macedonia and Togo?
- 14.84 million, with Togo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Togo?
- 37 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2026.
- How do North Macedonia and Togo rank globally for 11_sdr allocation?
- North Macedonia ranks 143rd and Togo ranks 141st of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- IMF, published as 11_SDR allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).