New Zealand vs Peru: 11_SDR allocation
11_SDR allocation over time
- New Zealand
- Peru
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 2.73 billion against 2.51 billion in Peru, a difference of 219.09 million.
That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Peru's.
Across all 36 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
New Zealand ranks 54th and Peru ranks 55th of 188 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 196.88 million | 127.22 million | 69.66 million | New Zealand |
| 2000s | 202.23 million | 130.68 million | 71.56 million | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 1.25 billion | 895.62 million | 358.11 million | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 2.24 billion | 1.98 billion | 260.94 million | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, New Zealand or Peru?
- New Zealand, at 2.73 billion against 2.51 billion in Peru as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation between New Zealand and Peru?
- 219.09 million, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Peru?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do New Zealand and Peru rank globally for 11_sdr allocation?
- New Zealand ranks 54th and Peru ranks 55th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- IMF, published as 11_SDR allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).