Netherlands vs Spain: 11_SDR allocation
11_SDR allocation over time
- Netherlands
- Spain
How they compare
Netherlands currently reports 17.55 billion against 15.90 billion in Spain, a difference of 1.65 billion.
That makes Netherlands's figure about 1.1 times Spain's.
Across all 36 years both countries report, Netherlands has been ahead every year.
Netherlands ranks 13th and Spain ranks 14th of 188 countries.
Netherlands has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Netherlands | Spain | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 738.84 million | 416.28 million | 322.56 million | Netherlands |
| 2000s | 758.93 million | 427.60 million | 331.33 million | Netherlands |
| 2010s | 7.10 billion | 4.15 billion | 2.95 billion | Netherlands |
| 2020s | 14.09 billion | 12.04 billion | 2.05 billion | Netherlands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, Netherlands or Spain?
- Netherlands, at 17.55 billion against 15.90 billion in Spain as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation between Netherlands and Spain?
- 1.65 billion, with Netherlands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Netherlands and Spain?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Netherlands and Spain rank globally for 11_sdr allocation?
- Netherlands ranks 13th and Spain ranks 14th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- IMF, published as 11_SDR allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).