Nepal vs Togo: 11_SDR allocation

Nepal
290.30 million
in 2025
Togo
280.40 million
in 2025
Nepal rank
138th
Togo rank
141st

11_SDR allocation over time

  • Nepal
  • Togo
0100.0M200.0M300.0M199020072025

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 290.30 million against 280.40 million in Togo, a difference of 9.90 million.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Togo ahead.

Nepal ranks 138th and Togo ranks 141st of 188 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Nepal averaged higher in 1 and Togo in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nepal Togo Difference Ahead
1990s 11.29 million 15.29 million 4.01 million Togo
2000s 11.60 million 15.71 million 4.11 million Togo
2010s 100.00 million 103.28 million 3.28 million Togo
2020s 227.49 million 221.85 million 5.65 million Nepal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, Nepal or Togo?
Nepal, at 290.30 million against 280.40 million in Togo as of 2025.
What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation between Nepal and Togo?
9.90 million, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Togo?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Nepal and Togo rank globally for 11_sdr allocation?
Nepal ranks 138th and Togo ranks 141st of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
IMF, published as 11_SDR allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
11_SDR allocation
Source
IMF
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
189 places, 6,685 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).