Namibia vs Turkmenistan: 11_SDR allocation
11_SDR allocation over time
- Namibia
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 425.29 million against 404.89 million in Turkmenistan, a difference of 20.40 million.
That makes Namibia's figure about 1.1 times Turkmenistan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 37 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Turkmenistan ahead.
Namibia ranks 118th and Turkmenistan ranks 121st of 189 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 191.47 million | 102.53 million | 88.95 million | Namibia |
| 2020s | 353.58 million | 315.03 million | 38.55 million | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, Namibia or Turkmenistan?
- Namibia, at 425.29 million against 404.89 million in Turkmenistan as of 2026.
- What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation between Namibia and Turkmenistan?
- 20.40 million, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Turkmenistan?
- 37 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2026.
- How do Namibia and Turkmenistan rank globally for 11_sdr allocation?
- Namibia ranks 118th and Turkmenistan ranks 121st of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- IMF, published as 11_SDR allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).