Montenegro vs San Marino: 11_SDR allocation
11_SDR allocation over time
- Montenegro
- San Marino
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 111.36 million against 83.30 million in San Marino, a difference of 28.06 million.
That makes Montenegro's figure about 1.3 times San Marino's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 28 shared years of data; in 1990 it was San Marino ahead.
Montenegro ranks 161st and San Marino ranks 162nd of 188 countries.
Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Montenegro | San Marino | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 37.92 million | 22.81 million | 15.11 million | Montenegro |
| 2020s | 87.13 million | 63.42 million | 23.71 million | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, Montenegro or San Marino?
- Montenegro, at 111.36 million against 83.30 million in San Marino as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation between Montenegro and San Marino?
- 28.06 million, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and San Marino?
- 28 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Montenegro and San Marino rank globally for 11_sdr allocation?
- Montenegro ranks 161st and San Marino ranks 162nd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- IMF, published as 11_SDR allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).