Moldova vs Sierra Leone: 11_SDR allocation
11_SDR allocation over time
- Moldova
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Sierra Leone currently reports 404.60 million against 383.92 million in Moldova, a difference of 20.68 million.
That makes Sierra Leone's figure about 1.1 times Moldova's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 37 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Sierra Leone ahead.
Moldova ranks 125th and Sierra Leone ranks 122nd of 189 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Moldova averaged higher in 1 and Sierra Leone in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Moldova | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 | 24.32 million | 24.32 million | Sierra Leone |
| 2000s | 0 | 24.98 million | 24.98 million | Sierra Leone |
| 2010s | 172.86 million | 146.12 million | 26.74 million | Moldova |
| 2020s | 319.19 million | 326.62 million | 7.43 million | Sierra Leone |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, Moldova or Sierra Leone?
- Sierra Leone, at 404.60 million against 383.92 million in Moldova as of 2026.
- What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation between Moldova and Sierra Leone?
- 20.68 million, with Sierra Leone ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Moldova and Sierra Leone?
- 37 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2026.
- How do Moldova and Sierra Leone rank globally for 11_sdr allocation?
- Moldova ranks 125th and Sierra Leone ranks 122nd of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- IMF, published as 11_SDR allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).