Micronesia (country) vs Tuvalu: 11_SDR allocation
11_SDR allocation over time
- Micronesia (country)
- Tuvalu
How they compare
Micronesia (country) currently reports 15.56 million against 5.43 million in Tuvalu, a difference of 10.13 million.
That makes Micronesia (country)'s figure about 2.9 times Tuvalu's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Tuvalu ahead.
Micronesia (country) ranks 184th and Tuvalu ranks 187th of 188 countries.
Micronesia (country) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Micronesia (country) | Tuvalu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 7.06 million | 2.22 million | 4.84 million | Micronesia (country) |
| 2020s | 12.73 million | 4.45 million | 8.28 million | Micronesia (country) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, Micronesia (country) or Tuvalu?
- Micronesia (country), at 15.56 million against 5.43 million in Tuvalu as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation between Micronesia (country) and Tuvalu?
- 10.13 million, with Micronesia (country) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia (country) and Tuvalu?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2025.
- How do Micronesia (country) and Tuvalu rank globally for 11_sdr allocation?
- Micronesia (country) ranks 184th and Tuvalu ranks 187th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- IMF, published as 11_SDR allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).