Mali vs Malta: 11_SDR allocation

Mali
356.37 million
in 2025
Malta
341.09 million
in 2025
Mali rank
126th
Malta rank
128th

11_SDR allocation over time

  • Mali
  • Malta
0100.0M200.0M300.0M400.0M199020072025

How they compare

Mali currently reports 356.37 million against 341.09 million in Malta, a difference of 15.28 million.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Mali ahead.

Mali ranks 126th and Malta ranks 128th of 188 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Mali averaged higher in 3 and Malta in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mali Malta Difference Ahead
1990s 22.17 million 15.73 million 6.44 million Mali
2000s 22.77 million 16.15 million 6.62 million Mali
2010s 131.23 million 140.10 million 8.87 million Malta
2020s 281.95 million 274.43 million 7.51 million Mali

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, Mali or Malta?
Mali, at 356.37 million against 341.09 million in Malta as of 2025.
What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation between Mali and Malta?
15.28 million, with Mali ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Malta?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Mali and Malta rank globally for 11_sdr allocation?
Mali ranks 126th and Malta ranks 128th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
IMF, published as 11_SDR allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
11_SDR allocation
Source
IMF
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
189 places, 6,685 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).