Malawi vs Togo: 11_SDR allocation

Malawi
264.94 million
in 2025
Togo
280.40 million
in 2025
Malawi rank
144th
Togo rank
141st

11_SDR allocation over time

  • Malawi
  • Togo
0100.0M200.0M300.0M199020072025

How they compare

Togo currently reports 280.40 million against 264.94 million in Malawi, a difference of 15.45 million.

That makes Togo's figure about 1.1 times Malawi's.

Across all 36 years both countries report, Togo has been ahead every year.

Malawi ranks 144th and Togo ranks 141st of 188 countries.

Togo has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Togo Difference Ahead
1990s 15.29 million 15.29 million 0
2000s 15.71 million 15.71 million 0
2010s 97.46 million 103.28 million 5.82 million Togo
2020s 209.58 million 221.85 million 12.27 million Togo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, Malawi or Togo?
Togo, at 280.40 million against 264.94 million in Malawi as of 2025.
What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation between Malawi and Togo?
15.45 million, with Togo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Togo?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Malawi and Togo rank globally for 11_sdr allocation?
Malawi ranks 144th and Togo ranks 141st of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
IMF, published as 11_SDR allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
11_SDR allocation
Source
IMF
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
189 places, 6,685 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).