Malawi vs North Macedonia: 11_SDR allocation
11_SDR allocation over time
- Malawi
- North Macedonia
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 271.40 million against 270.47 million in Malawi, a difference of 931,000.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 37 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Malawi ahead.
Malawi ranks 144th and North Macedonia ranks 143rd of 189 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 3 and North Macedonia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 15.29 million | 8.31 million | 6.99 million | Malawi |
| 2000s | 15.71 million | 11.99 million | 3.72 million | Malawi |
| 2010s | 97.46 million | 96.36 million | 1.10 million | Malawi |
| 2020s | 218.28 million | 218.64 million | 361,514 | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, Malawi or North Macedonia?
- North Macedonia, at 271.40 million against 270.47 million in Malawi as of 2026.
- What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation between Malawi and North Macedonia?
- 931,000, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and North Macedonia?
- 37 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2026.
- How do Malawi and North Macedonia rank globally for 11_sdr allocation?
- Malawi ranks 144th and North Macedonia ranks 143rd of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- IMF, published as 11_SDR allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).