Lithuania vs Syria: 11_SDR allocation

Lithuania
744.72 million
in 2025
Syria
744.85 million
in 2025
Lithuania rank
91st
Syria rank
90th

11_SDR allocation over time

  • Lithuania
  • Syria
0200.0M400.0M600.0M800.0M199020072025

How they compare

Syria currently reports 744.85 million against 744.72 million in Lithuania, a difference of 122,000.

Across all 36 years both countries report, Syria has been ahead every year.

Lithuania ranks 91st and Syria ranks 90th of 188 countries.

Syria has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania Syria Difference Ahead
1990s 0 50.94 million 50.94 million Syria
2000s 0 52.32 million 52.32 million Syria
2010s 201.53 million 409.98 million 208.44 million Syria
2020s 566.24 million 632.14 million 65.90 million Syria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, Lithuania or Syria?
Syria, at 744.85 million against 744.72 million in Lithuania as of 2025.
What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation between Lithuania and Syria?
122,000, with Syria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Syria?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Lithuania and Syria rank globally for 11_sdr allocation?
Lithuania ranks 91st and Syria ranks 90th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
IMF, published as 11_SDR allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
11_SDR allocation
Source
IMF
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
189 places, 6,685 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).