Lesotho vs San Marino: 11_SDR allocation
11_SDR allocation over time
- Lesotho
- San Marino
How they compare
Lesotho currently reports 135.34 million against 85.03 million in San Marino, a difference of 50.31 million.
That makes Lesotho's figure about 1.6 times San Marino's.
Across all 37 years both countries report, Lesotho has been ahead every year.
Lesotho ranks 159th and San Marino ranks 162nd of 189 countries.
Lesotho has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lesotho | San Marino | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5.21 million | 0 | 5.21 million | Lesotho |
| 2000s | 5.35 million | 0 | 5.35 million | Lesotho |
| 2010s | 48.28 million | 22.81 million | 25.47 million | Lesotho |
| 2020s | 109.09 million | 66.51 million | 42.59 million | Lesotho |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, Lesotho or San Marino?
- Lesotho, at 135.34 million against 85.03 million in San Marino as of 2026.
- What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation between Lesotho and San Marino?
- 50.31 million, with Lesotho ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and San Marino?
- 37 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2026.
- How do Lesotho and San Marino rank globally for 11_sdr allocation?
- Lesotho ranks 159th and San Marino ranks 162nd of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- IMF, published as 11_SDR allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).