Lebanon vs Sudan: 11_SDR allocation

Lebanon
1.06 billion
in 2025
Sudan
1.06 billion
in 2025
Lebanon rank
75th
Sudan rank
76th

11_SDR allocation over time

  • Lebanon
  • Sudan
0250.0M500.0M750.0M1.0B199020072025

How they compare

Lebanon currently reports 1.06 billion against 1.06 billion in Sudan, a difference of 3.08 million.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Sudan ahead.

Lebanon ranks 75th and Sudan ranks 76th of 188 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Lebanon averaged higher in 2 and Sudan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lebanon Sudan Difference Ahead
1990s 6.12 million 72.71 million 66.59 million Sudan
2000s 6.29 million 74.69 million 68.40 million Sudan
2010s 283.84 million 261.38 million 22.46 million Lebanon
2020s 807.42 million 798.26 million 9.17 million Lebanon

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, Lebanon or Sudan?
Lebanon, at 1.06 billion against 1.06 billion in Sudan as of 2025.
What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation between Lebanon and Sudan?
3.08 million, with Lebanon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lebanon and Sudan?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Lebanon and Sudan rank globally for 11_sdr allocation?
Lebanon ranks 75th and Sudan ranks 76th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
IMF, published as 11_SDR allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
11_SDR allocation
Source
IMF
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
189 places, 6,685 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).