Lebanon vs Qatar: 11_SDR allocation

Lebanon
1.06 billion
in 2025
Qatar
1.27 billion
in 2025
Lebanon rank
75th
Qatar rank
72nd

11_SDR allocation over time

  • Lebanon
  • Qatar
0500.0M1.0B1.5B199020072025

How they compare

Qatar currently reports 1.27 billion against 1.06 billion in Lebanon, a difference of 206.61 million.

That makes Qatar's figure about 1.2 times Lebanon's.

Across all 36 years both countries report, Qatar has been ahead every year.

Lebanon ranks 75th and Qatar ranks 72nd of 188 countries.

Qatar has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lebanon Qatar Difference Ahead
1990s 6.12 million 17.86 million 11.74 million Qatar
2000s 6.29 million 18.35 million 12.06 million Qatar
2010s 283.84 million 369.19 million 85.34 million Qatar
2020s 807.42 million 973.81 million 166.38 million Qatar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, Lebanon or Qatar?
Qatar, at 1.27 billion against 1.06 billion in Lebanon as of 2025.
What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation between Lebanon and Qatar?
206.61 million, with Qatar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lebanon and Qatar?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Lebanon and Qatar rank globally for 11_sdr allocation?
Lebanon ranks 75th and Qatar ranks 72nd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
IMF, published as 11_SDR allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
11_SDR allocation
Source
IMF
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
189 places, 6,685 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).