Kiribati vs Tonga: 11_SDR allocation

Kiribati
21.34 million
in 2025
Tonga
26.32 million
in 2025
Kiribati rank
183rd
Tonga rank
180th

11_SDR allocation over time

  • Kiribati
  • Tonga
010.0M20.0M30.0M199020072025

How they compare

Tonga currently reports 26.32 million against 21.34 million in Kiribati, a difference of 4.98 million.

That makes Tonga's figure about 1.2 times Kiribati's.

Across all 36 years both countries report, Tonga has been ahead every year.

Kiribati ranks 183rd and Tonga ranks 180th of 188 countries.

Tonga has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati Tonga Difference Ahead
1990s 0 0 0 β€”
2000s 0 0 0 β€”
2010s 7.82 million 9.66 million 1.85 million Tonga
2020s 16.87 million 20.81 million 3.94 million Tonga

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, Kiribati or Tonga?
Tonga, at 26.32 million against 21.34 million in Kiribati as of 2025.
What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation between Kiribati and Tonga?
4.98 million, with Tonga ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Tonga?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Kiribati and Tonga rank globally for 11_sdr allocation?
Kiribati ranks 183rd and Tonga ranks 180th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
IMF, published as 11_SDR allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
11_SDR allocation
Source
IMF
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
189 places, 6,685 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).