Kiribati vs Marshall Islands: 11_SDR allocation
11_SDR allocation over time
- Kiribati
- Marshall Islands
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 21.78 million against 10.88 million in Marshall Islands, a difference of 10.90 million.
That makes Kiribati's figure about 2.0 times Marshall Islands's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 37 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Marshall Islands ahead.
Kiribati ranks 184th and Marshall Islands ranks 186th of 189 countries.
Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Marshall Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 7.82 million | 4.89 million | 2.93 million | Kiribati |
| 2020s | 17.57 million | 9.04 million | 8.53 million | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, Kiribati or Marshall Islands?
- Kiribati, at 21.78 million against 10.88 million in Marshall Islands as of 2026.
- What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation between Kiribati and Marshall Islands?
- 10.90 million, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Marshall Islands?
- 37 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2026.
- How do Kiribati and Marshall Islands rank globally for 11_sdr allocation?
- Kiribati ranks 184th and Marshall Islands ranks 186th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- IMF, published as 11_SDR allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).