Kenya vs Trinidad and Tobago: 11_SDR allocation

Kenya
1.04 billion
in 2025
Trinidad and Tobago
1.02 billion
in 2025
Kenya rank
79th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
81st

11_SDR allocation over time

  • Kenya
  • Trinidad and Tobago
0250.0M500.0M750.0M1.0B199020072025

How they compare

Kenya currently reports 1.04 billion against 1.02 billion in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 11.26 million.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

Kenya ranks 79th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 81st of 188 countries.

Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kenya Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1990s 51.53 million 64.41 million 12.87 million Trinidad and Tobago
2000s 52.93 million 66.16 million 13.22 million Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 381.29 million 471.58 million 90.29 million Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 819.75 million 840.65 million 20.91 million Trinidad and Tobago

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, Kenya or Trinidad and Tobago?
Kenya, at 1.04 billion against 1.02 billion in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2025.
What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation between Kenya and Trinidad and Tobago?
11.26 million, with Kenya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Trinidad and Tobago?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Kenya and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for 11_sdr allocation?
Kenya ranks 79th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 81st of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
IMF, published as 11_SDR allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
11_SDR allocation
Source
IMF
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
189 places, 6,685 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).