Kenya vs Slovenia: 11_SDR allocation

Kenya
1.04 billion
in 2025
Slovenia
1.03 billion
in 2025
Kenya rank
79th
Slovenia rank
80th

11_SDR allocation over time

  • Kenya
  • Slovenia
0250.0M500.0M750.0M1.0B199020072025

How they compare

Kenya currently reports 1.04 billion against 1.03 billion in Slovenia, a difference of 2.49 million.

Across all 36 years both countries report, Kenya has been ahead every year.

Kenya ranks 79th and Slovenia ranks 80th of 188 countries.

Kenya has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kenya Slovenia Difference Ahead
1990s 51.53 million 25.21 million 26.32 million Kenya
2000s 52.93 million 36.39 million 16.54 million Kenya
2010s 381.29 million 317.02 million 64.27 million Kenya
2020s 819.75 million 797.77 million 21.98 million Kenya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, Kenya or Slovenia?
Kenya, at 1.04 billion against 1.03 billion in Slovenia as of 2025.
What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation between Kenya and Slovenia?
2.49 million, with Kenya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Slovenia?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Kenya and Slovenia rank globally for 11_sdr allocation?
Kenya ranks 79th and Slovenia ranks 80th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
IMF, published as 11_SDR allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
11_SDR allocation
Source
IMF
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
189 places, 6,685 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).