Iran vs Malaysia: 11_SDR allocation

Iran
6.44 billion
in 2025
Malaysia
6.42 billion
in 2025
Iran rank
28th
Malaysia rank
29th

11_SDR allocation over time

  • Iran
  • Malaysia
02.0B4.0B6.0B199020072025

How they compare

Iran currently reports 6.44 billion against 6.42 billion in Malaysia, a difference of 21.24 million.

Across all 36 years both countries report, Iran has been ahead every year.

Iran ranks 28th and Malaysia ranks 29th of 188 countries.

Iran has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iran Malaysia Difference Ahead
1990s 340.01 million 193.72 million 146.29 million Iran
2000s 349.25 million 198.98 million 150.27 million Iran
2010s 2.09 billion 1.98 billion 117.36 million Iran
2020s 5.01 billion 4.95 billion 51.39 million Iran

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, Iran or Malaysia?
Iran, at 6.44 billion against 6.42 billion in Malaysia as of 2025.
What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation between Iran and Malaysia?
21.24 million, with Iran ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iran and Malaysia?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Iran and Malaysia rank globally for 11_sdr allocation?
Iran ranks 28th and Malaysia ranks 29th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
IMF, published as 11_SDR allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
11_SDR allocation
Source
IMF
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
189 places, 6,685 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).