India vs Netherlands: 11_SDR allocation
11_SDR allocation over time
- India
- Netherlands
How they compare
India currently reports 21.99 billion against 17.55 billion in Netherlands, a difference of 4.43 billion.
That makes India's figure about 1.3 times Netherlands's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was India ahead.
India ranks 10th and Netherlands ranks 13th of 188 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, India averaged higher in 3 and Netherlands in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | India | Netherlands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 948.97 million | 738.84 million | 210.13 million | India |
| 2000s | 974.77 million | 758.93 million | 215.84 million | India |
| 2010s | 5.84 billion | 7.10 billion | 1.26 billion | Netherlands |
| 2020s | 16.68 billion | 14.09 billion | 2.59 billion | India |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, India or Netherlands?
- India, at 21.99 billion against 17.55 billion in Netherlands as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation between India and Netherlands?
- 4.43 billion, with India ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for India and Netherlands?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do India and Netherlands rank globally for 11_sdr allocation?
- India ranks 10th and Netherlands ranks 13th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- IMF, published as 11_SDR allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).