Hungary vs United Arab Emirates: 11_SDR allocation

Hungary
3.79 billion
in 2025
United Arab Emirates
3.70 billion
in 2025
Hungary rank
44th
United Arab Emirates rank
46th

11_SDR allocation over time

  • Hungary
  • United Arab Emirates
01.0B2.0B3.0B4.0B199020072025

How they compare

Hungary currently reports 3.79 billion against 3.70 billion in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 88.85 million.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was United Arab Emirates ahead.

Hungary ranks 44th and United Arab Emirates ranks 46th of 188 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Hungary averaged higher in 2 and United Arab Emirates in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hungary United Arab Emirates Difference Ahead
1990s 0 53.97 million 53.97 million United Arab Emirates
2000s 0 55.43 million 55.43 million United Arab Emirates
2010s 1.46 billion 834.70 million 620.65 million Hungary
2020s 3.02 billion 2.76 billion 255.93 million Hungary

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, Hungary or United Arab Emirates?
Hungary, at 3.79 billion against 3.70 billion in United Arab Emirates as of 2025.
What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation between Hungary and United Arab Emirates?
88.85 million, with Hungary ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and United Arab Emirates?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Hungary and United Arab Emirates rank globally for 11_sdr allocation?
Hungary ranks 44th and United Arab Emirates ranks 46th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
IMF, published as 11_SDR allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
11_SDR allocation
Source
IMF
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
189 places, 6,685 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).