Guatemala vs Lithuania: 11_SDR allocation
11_SDR allocation over time
- Guatemala
- Lithuania
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 812.77 million against 744.72 million in Lithuania, a difference of 68.05 million.
That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.1 times Lithuania's.
Across all 36 years both countries report, Guatemala has been ahead every year.
Guatemala ranks 88th and Lithuania ranks 91st of 188 countries.
Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 38.56 million | 0 | 38.56 million | Guatemala |
| 2000s | 39.61 million | 0 | 39.61 million | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 295.04 million | 201.53 million | 93.50 million | Guatemala |
| 2020s | 641.69 million | 566.24 million | 75.45 million | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, Guatemala or Lithuania?
- Guatemala, at 812.77 million against 744.72 million in Lithuania as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation between Guatemala and Lithuania?
- 68.05 million, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Lithuania?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Guatemala and Lithuania rank globally for 11_sdr allocation?
- Guatemala ranks 88th and Lithuania ranks 91st of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- IMF, published as 11_SDR allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).