Georgia vs South Sudan: 11_SDR allocation

Georgia
459.22 million
in 2025
South Sudan
453.33 million
in 2025
Georgia rank
115th
South Sudan rank
116th

11_SDR allocation over time

  • Georgia
  • South Sudan
0100.0M200.0M300.0M400.0M500.0M199020072025

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 459.22 million against 453.33 million in South Sudan, a difference of 5.89 million.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Georgia has been ahead every year.

Georgia ranks 115th and South Sudan ranks 116th of 188 countries.

Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia South Sudan Difference Ahead
2010s 210.61 million 135.27 million 75.34 million Georgia
2020s 376.68 million 354.82 million 21.85 million Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, Georgia or South Sudan?
Georgia, at 459.22 million against 453.33 million in South Sudan as of 2025.
What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation between Georgia and South Sudan?
5.89 million, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and South Sudan?
15 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2025.
How do Georgia and South Sudan rank globally for 11_sdr allocation?
Georgia ranks 115th and South Sudan ranks 116th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
IMF, published as 11_SDR allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
11_SDR allocation
Source
IMF
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
189 places, 6,685 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).