Georgia vs Namibia: 11_SDR allocation

Georgia
459.22 million
in 2025
Namibia
416.61 million
in 2025
Georgia rank
115th
Namibia rank
118th

11_SDR allocation over time

  • Georgia
  • Namibia
0100.0M200.0M300.0M400.0M500.0M199020072025

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 459.22 million against 416.61 million in Namibia, a difference of 42.61 million.

That makes Georgia's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Namibia ahead.

Georgia ranks 115th and Namibia ranks 118th of 188 countries.

Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 0 0 0
2000s 0 0 0
2010s 211.40 million 191.47 million 19.93 million Georgia
2020s 376.68 million 341.62 million 35.05 million Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, Georgia or Namibia?
Georgia, at 459.22 million against 416.61 million in Namibia as of 2025.
What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation between Georgia and Namibia?
42.61 million, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Namibia?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Georgia and Namibia rank globally for 11_sdr allocation?
Georgia ranks 115th and Namibia ranks 118th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
IMF, published as 11_SDR allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
11_SDR allocation
Source
IMF
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
189 places, 6,685 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).