Estonia vs Moldova: 11_SDR allocation

Estonia
392.56 million
in 2025
Moldova
376.08 million
in 2025
Estonia rank
123rd
Moldova rank
125th

11_SDR allocation over time

  • Estonia
  • Moldova
0100.0M200.0M300.0M400.0M199020072025

How they compare

Estonia currently reports 392.56 million against 376.08 million in Moldova, a difference of 16.47 million.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Moldova ahead.

Estonia ranks 123rd and Moldova ranks 125th of 188 countries.

Moldova has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Estonia Moldova Difference Ahead
1990s 0 0 0 β€”
2000s 0 0 0 β€”
2010s 91.00 million 172.86 million 81.87 million Moldova
2020s 293.67 million 308.40 million 14.73 million Moldova

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, Estonia or Moldova?
Estonia, at 392.56 million against 376.08 million in Moldova as of 2025.
What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation between Estonia and Moldova?
16.47 million, with Estonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Moldova?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Estonia and Moldova rank globally for 11_sdr allocation?
Estonia ranks 123rd and Moldova ranks 125th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
IMF, published as 11_SDR allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
11_SDR allocation
Source
IMF
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
189 places, 6,685 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).