Equatorial Guinea vs Mauritania: 11_SDR allocation
11_SDR allocation over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Mauritania
How they compare
Mauritania currently reports 251.09 million against 247.20 million in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 3.89 million.
Across all 37 years both countries report, Mauritania has been ahead every year.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 148th and Mauritania ranks 147th of 189 countries.
Mauritania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 8.10 million | 13.54 million | 5.45 million | Mauritania |
| 2000s | 8.32 million | 13.91 million | 5.59 million | Mauritania |
| 2010s | 45.95 million | 90.56 million | 44.61 million | Mauritania |
| 2020s | 187.83 million | 202.66 million | 14.83 million | Mauritania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, Equatorial Guinea or Mauritania?
- Mauritania, at 251.09 million against 247.20 million in Equatorial Guinea as of 2026.
- What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation between Equatorial Guinea and Mauritania?
- 3.89 million, with Mauritania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Mauritania?
- 37 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2026.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Mauritania rank globally for 11_sdr allocation?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 148th and Mauritania ranks 147th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- IMF, published as 11_SDR allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).