El Salvador vs Ethiopia: 11_SDR allocation
11_SDR allocation over time
- El Salvador
- Ethiopia
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 595.56 million against 564.45 million in Ethiopia, a difference of 31.11 million.
That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.1 times Ethiopia's.
Across all 37 years both countries report, El Salvador has been ahead every year.
El Salvador ranks 103rd and Ethiopia ranks 106th of 189 countries.
El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Ethiopia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 34.81 million | 15.55 million | 19.26 million | El Salvador |
| 2000s | 35.75 million | 15.97 million | 19.78 million | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 240.55 million | 187.87 million | 52.68 million | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 487.67 million | 451.33 million | 36.33 million | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, El Salvador or Ethiopia?
- El Salvador, at 595.56 million against 564.45 million in Ethiopia as of 2026.
- What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation between El Salvador and Ethiopia?
- 31.11 million, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Ethiopia?
- 37 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2026.
- How do El Salvador and Ethiopia rank globally for 11_sdr allocation?
- El Salvador ranks 103rd and Ethiopia ranks 106th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- IMF, published as 11_SDR allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).