Ecuador vs Sri Lanka: 11_SDR allocation
11_SDR allocation over time
- Ecuador
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 1.27 billion against 1.26 billion in Sri Lanka, a difference of 9.12 million.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Ecuador ranks 71st and Sri Lanka ranks 73rd of 188 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 45.88 million | 98.73 million | 52.86 million | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 47.12 million | 101.41 million | 54.29 million | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 423.45 million | 580.73 million | 157.28 million | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 991.94 million | 1.04 billion | 43.51 million | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, Ecuador or Sri Lanka?
- Ecuador, at 1.27 billion against 1.26 billion in Sri Lanka as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation between Ecuador and Sri Lanka?
- 9.12 million, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Sri Lanka?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Ecuador and Sri Lanka rank globally for 11_sdr allocation?
- Ecuador ranks 71st and Sri Lanka ranks 73rd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- IMF, published as 11_SDR allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).