Ecuador vs Qatar: 11_SDR allocation

Ecuador
1.27 billion
in 2025
Qatar
1.27 billion
in 2025
Ecuador rank
71st
Qatar rank
72nd

11_SDR allocation over time

  • Ecuador
  • Qatar
0500.0M1.0B1.5B199020072025

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 1.27 billion against 1.27 billion in Qatar, a difference of 1.47 million.

Across all 36 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.

Ecuador ranks 71st and Qatar ranks 72nd of 188 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Qatar Difference Ahead
1990s 45.88 million 17.86 million 28.01 million Ecuador
2000s 47.12 million 18.35 million 28.77 million Ecuador
2010s 423.45 million 369.19 million 54.27 million Ecuador
2020s 991.94 million 973.81 million 18.13 million Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, Ecuador or Qatar?
Ecuador, at 1.27 billion against 1.27 billion in Qatar as of 2025.
What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation between Ecuador and Qatar?
1.47 million, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Qatar?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Ecuador and Qatar rank globally for 11_sdr allocation?
Ecuador ranks 71st and Qatar ranks 72nd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
IMF, published as 11_SDR allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
11_SDR allocation
Source
IMF
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
189 places, 6,685 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).