Djibouti vs San Marino: 11_SDR allocation
11_SDR allocation over time
- Djibouti
- San Marino
How they compare
San Marino currently reports 85.03 million against 61.90 million in Djibouti, a difference of 23.13 million.
That makes San Marino's figure about 1.4 times Djibouti's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 37 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Djibouti ahead.
Djibouti ranks 163rd and San Marino ranks 162nd of 189 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Djibouti averaged higher in 2 and San Marino in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Djibouti | San Marino | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.64 million | 0 | 1.64 million | Djibouti |
| 2000s | 1.69 million | 0 | 1.69 million | Djibouti |
| 2010s | 22.26 million | 22.81 million | 551,730 | San Marino |
| 2020s | 49.95 million | 66.51 million | 16.56 million | San Marino |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, Djibouti or San Marino?
- San Marino, at 85.03 million against 61.90 million in Djibouti as of 2026.
- What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation between Djibouti and San Marino?
- 23.13 million, with San Marino ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and San Marino?
- 37 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2026.
- How do Djibouti and San Marino rank globally for 11_sdr allocation?
- Djibouti ranks 163rd and San Marino ranks 162nd of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- IMF, published as 11_SDR allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).