Djibouti vs Montenegro: 11_SDR allocation
11_SDR allocation over time
- Djibouti
- Montenegro
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 113.68 million against 61.90 million in Djibouti, a difference of 51.78 million.
That makes Montenegro's figure about 1.8 times Djibouti's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 29 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Djibouti ahead.
Djibouti ranks 163rd and Montenegro ranks 161st of 189 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Djibouti averaged higher in 2 and Montenegro in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Djibouti | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.65 million | 0 | 1.65 million | Djibouti |
| 2000s | 1.83 million | 0 | 1.83 million | Djibouti |
| 2010s | 22.26 million | 37.92 million | 15.66 million | Montenegro |
| 2020s | 49.95 million | 90.92 million | 40.97 million | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, Djibouti or Montenegro?
- Montenegro, at 113.68 million against 61.90 million in Djibouti as of 2026.
- What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation between Djibouti and Montenegro?
- 51.78 million, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Montenegro?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2026.
- How do Djibouti and Montenegro rank globally for 11_sdr allocation?
- Djibouti ranks 163rd and Montenegro ranks 161st of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- IMF, published as 11_SDR allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).