Djibouti vs Germany: 11_SDR allocation
11_SDR allocation over time
- Djibouti
- Germany
How they compare
Germany currently reports 49.94 billion against 60.64 million in Djibouti, a difference of 49.88 billion.
That makes Germany's figure about 823.6 times Djibouti's.
Across all 36 years both countries report, Germany has been ahead every year.
Djibouti ranks 1st and Germany ranks 3rd of 1 regions.
Germany has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Djibouti | Germany | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.64 million | 1.69 billion | 1.69 billion | Germany |
| 2000s | 1.69 million | 1.73 billion | 1.73 billion | Germany |
| 2010s | 22.26 million | 17.71 billion | 17.69 billion | Germany |
| 2020s | 47.95 million | 39.30 billion | 39.25 billion | Germany |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, Djibouti or Germany?
- Germany, at 49.94 billion against 60.64 million in Djibouti as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation between Djibouti and Germany?
- 49.88 billion, with Germany ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Germany?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Djibouti and Germany rank globally for 11_sdr allocation?
- Djibouti ranks 1st and Germany ranks 3rd of 1 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- IMF, published as 11_SDR allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).