Denmark vs Iran: 11_SDR allocation

Denmark
6.41 billion
in 2025
Iran
6.44 billion
in 2025
Denmark rank
30th
Iran rank
28th

11_SDR allocation over time

  • Denmark
  • Iran
02.0B4.0B6.0B199020072025

How they compare

Iran currently reports 6.44 billion against 6.41 billion in Denmark, a difference of 22.56 million.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Iran ahead.

Denmark ranks 30th and Iran ranks 28th of 188 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Denmark averaged higher in 2 and Iran in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Iran Difference Ahead
1990s 249.18 million 340.01 million 90.83 million Iran
2000s 255.96 million 349.25 million 93.29 million Iran
2010s 2.25 billion 2.09 billion 154.80 million Denmark
2020s 5.04 billion 5.01 billion 33.65 million Denmark

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, Denmark or Iran?
Iran, at 6.44 billion against 6.41 billion in Denmark as of 2025.
What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation between Denmark and Iran?
22.56 million, with Iran ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Iran?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Denmark and Iran rank globally for 11_sdr allocation?
Denmark ranks 30th and Iran ranks 28th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
IMF, published as 11_SDR allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
11_SDR allocation
Source
IMF
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
189 places, 6,685 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).