Czechia vs Pakistan: 11_SDR allocation

Czechia
3.81 billion
in 2025
Pakistan
3.90 billion
in 2025
Czechia rank
42nd
Pakistan rank
41st

11_SDR allocation over time

  • Czechia
  • Pakistan
01.0B2.0B3.0B4.0B199020072025

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 3.90 billion against 3.81 billion in Czechia, a difference of 86.85 million.

Across all 36 years both countries report, Pakistan has been ahead every year.

Czechia ranks 42nd and Pakistan ranks 41st of 188 countries.

Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Czechia Pakistan Difference Ahead
1990s 0 236.82 million 236.82 million Pakistan
2000s 0 243.26 million 243.26 million Pakistan
2010s 1.15 billion 1.45 billion 305.98 million Pakistan
2020s 2.94 billion 3.09 billion 155.22 million Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, Czechia or Pakistan?
Pakistan, at 3.90 billion against 3.81 billion in Czechia as of 2025.
What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation between Czechia and Pakistan?
86.85 million, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Pakistan?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Czechia and Pakistan rank globally for 11_sdr allocation?
Czechia ranks 42nd and Pakistan ranks 41st of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
IMF, published as 11_SDR allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
11_SDR allocation
Source
IMF
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
189 places, 6,685 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).