Czechia vs Egypt: 11_SDR allocation

Czechia
3.81 billion
in 2025
Egypt
3.79 billion
in 2025
Czechia rank
42nd
Egypt rank
43rd

11_SDR allocation over time

  • Czechia
  • Egypt
01.0B2.0B3.0B4.0B199020072025

How they compare

Czechia currently reports 3.81 billion against 3.79 billion in Egypt, a difference of 25.11 million.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Egypt ahead.

Czechia ranks 42nd and Egypt ranks 43rd of 188 countries.

Egypt has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Czechia Egypt Difference Ahead
1990s 0 189.36 million 189.36 million Egypt
2000s 0 194.51 million 194.51 million Egypt
2010s 1.15 billion 1.32 billion 173.65 million Egypt
2020s 2.94 billion 2.97 billion 37.88 million Egypt

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, Czechia or Egypt?
Czechia, at 3.81 billion against 3.79 billion in Egypt as of 2025.
What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation between Czechia and Egypt?
25.11 million, with Czechia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Egypt?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Czechia and Egypt rank globally for 11_sdr allocation?
Czechia ranks 42nd and Egypt ranks 43rd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
IMF, published as 11_SDR allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
11_SDR allocation
Source
IMF
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
189 places, 6,685 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).