Croatia vs Slovakia: 11_SDR allocation
11_SDR allocation over time
- Croatia
- Slovakia
How they compare
Slovakia currently reports 1.73 billion against 1.38 billion in Croatia, a difference of 352.04 million.
That makes Slovakia's figure about 1.3 times Croatia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Slovakia ahead.
Croatia ranks 67th and Slovakia ranks 64th of 188 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 3 and Slovakia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Slovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 43.82 million | 0 | 43.82 million | Croatia |
| 2000s | 63.26 million | 0 | 63.26 million | Croatia |
| 2010s | 510.07 million | 499.99 million | 10.08 million | Croatia |
| 2020s | 1.09 billion | 1.32 billion | 234.41 million | Slovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, Croatia or Slovakia?
- Slovakia, at 1.73 billion against 1.38 billion in Croatia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation between Croatia and Slovakia?
- 352.04 million, with Slovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Slovakia?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Croatia and Slovakia rank globally for 11_sdr allocation?
- Croatia ranks 67th and Slovakia ranks 64th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- IMF, published as 11_SDR allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).