Cote d'Ivoire vs Qatar: 11_SDR allocation
11_SDR allocation over time
- Cote d'Ivoire
- Qatar
How they compare
Qatar currently reports 1.27 billion against 1.24 billion in Cote d'Ivoire, a difference of 28.81 million.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 74th and Qatar ranks 72nd of 188 countries.
Cote d'Ivoire has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cote d'Ivoire | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 52.70 million | 17.86 million | 34.84 million | Cote d'Ivoire |
| 2000s | 54.13 million | 18.35 million | 35.78 million | Cote d'Ivoire |
| 2010s | 456.56 million | 369.19 million | 87.38 million | Cote d'Ivoire |
| 2020s | 981.96 million | 973.81 million | 8.15 million | Cote d'Ivoire |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, Cote d'Ivoire or Qatar?
- Qatar, at 1.27 billion against 1.24 billion in Cote d'Ivoire as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation between Cote d'Ivoire and Qatar?
- 28.81 million, with Qatar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Qatar?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Cote d'Ivoire and Qatar rank globally for 11_sdr allocation?
- Cote d'Ivoire ranks 74th and Qatar ranks 72nd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- IMF, published as 11_SDR allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).